<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: books you should read part two &#8211; the lexical approach by michael lewis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livesofteachers.com/2010/02/07/books-you-should-read-part-two-the-lexical-approach-by-michael-lewis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livesofteachers.com/2010/02/07/books-you-should-read-part-two-the-lexical-approach-by-michael-lewis/</link>
	<description>teaching and learning languages</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:33:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tesl ej</title>
		<link>http://www.livesofteachers.com/2010/02/07/books-you-should-read-part-two-the-lexical-approach-by-michael-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-1332</link>
		<dc:creator>tesl ej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livesofteachers.com/?p=349#comment-1332</guid>
		<description>[...] (CDI) Busan ... As the premier provider of educational services, we employ 400 instructors at 60 ...the lives of teachers Blog Archive books you should read ...Anca M. Nemoianu, for example, writing in TESL-EJ, complained of the signs of distrust, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (CDI) Busan &#8230; As the premier provider of educational services, we employ 400 instructors at 60 &#8230;the lives of teachers Blog Archive books you should read &#8230;Anca M. Nemoianu, for example, writing in TESL-EJ, complained of the signs of distrust, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sputnik</title>
		<link>http://www.livesofteachers.com/2010/02/07/books-you-should-read-part-two-the-lexical-approach-by-michael-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Sputnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livesofteachers.com/?p=349#comment-878</guid>
		<description>Probably not coincidentally I was reading one of your old articles on this very subject not long after I finished writing the review.  You make the point there very persuasively about the tedium of chunking exercises and I can&#039;t but help agree with you.  However, I still find the idea very seductive and hope that Teaching Chunks of Language has the answer.  Be assured, I will be tuning in for the next instalment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably not coincidentally I was reading one of your old articles on this very subject not long after I finished writing the review.  You make the point there very persuasively about the tedium of chunking exercises and I can&#8217;t but help agree with you.  However, I still find the idea very seductive and hope that Teaching Chunks of Language has the answer.  Be assured, I will be tuning in for the next instalment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Case</title>
		<link>http://www.livesofteachers.com/2010/02/07/books-you-should-read-part-two-the-lexical-approach-by-michael-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livesofteachers.com/?p=349#comment-875</guid>
		<description>A great book, brilliantly described. As you say, it was its readability that really made the difference. Whatever happened to Michael Lewis? He would&#039;ve made a great TEFL blogger!

When it comes down to his legacy, I think it is mixed at best. The proof of the pudding is in the textbooking, and Business Matters is a great textbook just because it was written well by a good author. Innovations is much more mixed, being based too much on a native speaker model and amusing but basically useless for students outside the UK. More seriously, the methodology for learning those collocations is a real step back with stacks of made up sounding dialogues and gapfills. The legacy with non-ex-LTP books is worse, with mind maps and sentence matching filling up page after tedious page. I think it is the reality of teaching collocations that convinced me that motivation and teachability are the most important things for students who don&#039;t need a particular kind of language right now, i.e. how you teach is more important than what you teach. To quote a newish book exactly on Teaching Chunks of Language:


&quot;At the core of the Lexical Approach to learning English is the belief that ambitious students need to acquire masses of multi-word &#039;chunks of language&#039;. But the techniques and exercises characteristic of this approach do not furnish teachers with an adequate means of helping students remember those hundreds or thousands of additional, complex, items of vocabulary. Consequently, within the Lexical Approach so far, the student has been someone expected to row across an ocean in a very leaky boat, the teacher, frustratingly, has been given no adequate way of helping them. We hope this book will begin to change things for the better&quot;

I hope so too, but as I&#039;ve only just finished the introduction I&#039;ll have to leave you with that cliffhanger: 

&quot;Will chunks of language suddenly be made interesting? Will Alex&#039;s faith in collocations be restored? Will Jaime discover that both of his twin brothers are having affairs with his seventh wife? Find out, only in MET magazine!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great book, brilliantly described. As you say, it was its readability that really made the difference. Whatever happened to Michael Lewis? He would&#8217;ve made a great TEFL blogger!</p>
<p>When it comes down to his legacy, I think it is mixed at best. The proof of the pudding is in the textbooking, and Business Matters is a great textbook just because it was written well by a good author. Innovations is much more mixed, being based too much on a native speaker model and amusing but basically useless for students outside the UK. More seriously, the methodology for learning those collocations is a real step back with stacks of made up sounding dialogues and gapfills. The legacy with non-ex-LTP books is worse, with mind maps and sentence matching filling up page after tedious page. I think it is the reality of teaching collocations that convinced me that motivation and teachability are the most important things for students who don&#8217;t need a particular kind of language right now, i.e. how you teach is more important than what you teach. To quote a newish book exactly on Teaching Chunks of Language:</p>
<p>&#8220;At the core of the Lexical Approach to learning English is the belief that ambitious students need to acquire masses of multi-word &#8216;chunks of language&#8217;. But the techniques and exercises characteristic of this approach do not furnish teachers with an adequate means of helping students remember those hundreds or thousands of additional, complex, items of vocabulary. Consequently, within the Lexical Approach so far, the student has been someone expected to row across an ocean in a very leaky boat, the teacher, frustratingly, has been given no adequate way of helping them. We hope this book will begin to change things for the better&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope so too, but as I&#8217;ve only just finished the introduction I&#8217;ll have to leave you with that cliffhanger: </p>
<p>&#8220;Will chunks of language suddenly be made interesting? Will Alex&#8217;s faith in collocations be restored? Will Jaime discover that both of his twin brothers are having affairs with his seventh wife? Find out, only in MET magazine!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sputnik</title>
		<link>http://www.livesofteachers.com/2010/02/07/books-you-should-read-part-two-the-lexical-approach-by-michael-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Sputnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livesofteachers.com/?p=349#comment-844</guid>
		<description>Certainement!  Yes, I think he co-founded and was editor of LTP which published a whole bunch of lexical approach books of varying degrees for business students and others.  However, I think that was taken over by Thomson some years back and, although it is in turn a division of Heinle (according to Google), it still publishes lexically-oriented books in its own way, such as the Innovations series. Hopefully, at the very least, Michael Lewis made a packet from the buy-out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainement!  Yes, I think he co-founded and was editor of LTP which published a whole bunch of lexical approach books of varying degrees for business students and others.  However, I think that was taken over by Thomson some years back and, although it is in turn a division of Heinle (according to Google), it still publishes lexically-oriented books in its own way, such as the Innovations series. Hopefully, at the very least, Michael Lewis made a packet from the buy-out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darren</title>
		<link>http://www.livesofteachers.com/2010/02/07/books-you-should-read-part-two-the-lexical-approach-by-michael-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livesofteachers.com/?p=349#comment-840</guid>
		<description>A colleague of mine pointed out the very pertinent fact that Lewis self-published this book... whether that was through necessity (i.e. no one would take it on) or choice (he wanted complete editorial control) it would seem to be quite relevant when considering the tone of the book, n&#039;est pas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A colleague of mine pointed out the very pertinent fact that Lewis self-published this book&#8230; whether that was through necessity (i.e. no one would take it on) or choice (he wanted complete editorial control) it would seem to be quite relevant when considering the tone of the book, n&#8217;est pas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sputnik</title>
		<link>http://www.livesofteachers.com/2010/02/07/books-you-should-read-part-two-the-lexical-approach-by-michael-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>Sputnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livesofteachers.com/?p=349#comment-831</guid>
		<description>I concur with your first point, Adam, and thank you for your second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with your first point, Adam, and thank you for your second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.livesofteachers.com/2010/02/07/books-you-should-read-part-two-the-lexical-approach-by-michael-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livesofteachers.com/?p=349#comment-821</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d consider having not at least read this book as a serious dereliction of teaching duty. Good post on an essential text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d consider having not at least read this book as a serious dereliction of teaching duty. Good post on an essential text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention the lives of teachers » Blog Archive » books you should read part two – the lexical approach by michael lewis -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.livesofteachers.com/2010/02/07/books-you-should-read-part-two-the-lexical-approach-by-michael-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention the lives of teachers » Blog Archive » books you should read part two – the lexical approach by michael lewis -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livesofteachers.com/?p=349#comment-800</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Darren Elliott, Carrie Schneider. Carrie Schneider said: the lives of teachers » Blog Archive » books you should read part ...: Persuasiveness in teaching often has more t... http://bit.ly/dxpwPU [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Darren Elliott, Carrie Schneider. Carrie Schneider said: the lives of teachers » Blog Archive » books you should read part &#8230;: Persuasiveness in teaching often has more t&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/dxpwPU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dxpwPU</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the lives of teachers » Blog Archive » books you should read part &#8230; &#124; EducatorsArea.Com</title>
		<link>http://www.livesofteachers.com/2010/02/07/books-you-should-read-part-two-the-lexical-approach-by-michael-lewis/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>the lives of teachers » Blog Archive » books you should read part &#8230; &#124; EducatorsArea.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livesofteachers.com/?p=349#comment-792</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more here:  the lives of teachers » Blog Archive » books you should read part &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more here:  the lives of teachers » Blog Archive » books you should read part &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
